When Does Freedom Become Agency?
An Independence Day reflection on women, empowerment and the things we sometimes count too quickly.
Happy Independence Day.
Today, as we celebrate freedom, I find myself thinking about a word that we use very easily in the development sector:
Empowerment.
For decades, I have heard—and probably used myself—sentences such as:
We empowered 500 women.
The programme empowered women economically.
Women were empowered through Self-Help Groups.
And somewhere along the way, I began to feel uncomfortable with this language.
Can I really empower another woman?
Can an organisation empower her?
Can a project?
Or is empowerment something that happens when the conditions around a woman change sufficiently for her own agency to expand?
That distinction may sound like semantics.
I don’t think it is.
Put it in the Thought Pan
Consider a woman who has started earning ₹5,000 every month.
Our programme data may record her as economically empowered.
But suppose she cannot decide how that ₹5,000 will be spent.
What exactly has changed?
Now consider another woman who has joined a Self-Help Group. She attends every meeting. Her attendance is excellent. She participates in training programmes.
But at home, she still cannot decide whether she can visit the health centre, travel to the market, buy something for herself or allow her daughter to continue her education.
What exactly have we measured?
Or consider the woman whose name appears proudly against the indicator:
“Women with access to formal banking.”
She has a bank account.
But her husband keeps the passbook.
Someone else knows the PIN.
Someone else decides when money is withdrawn.
She has access.
Does she have control?
Participation is not agency
This is where development language sometimes gets ahead of lived reality.
We count women who attended.
Women who received.
Women who enrolled.
Women who opened accounts.
Women who were trained.
Women who received livelihood assets.
Women who became members of committees.
All of these matter. They may be important first steps.
But they are not necessarily evidence of agency.
Because participation is not agency.
Access is not control.
And an output is not necessarily a change.
A livelihood asset may enter a household without changing who makes decisions.
A bank account may be opened without changing financial power.
A woman may sit on a village committee without anyone listening when she speaks.
And sometimes a programme can improve a woman’s income while leaving her control over her time, mobility and choices almost untouched.
This is precisely why numbers alone have never been enough for an evaluator.
The number tells us what happened.
We still need to ask why, how—and for whom did it actually change something?
So what can programmes do?
Perhaps we need to become a little more modest about our role as evaluators.
We cannot give another human being agency.
But we can help create the conditions in which agency becomes possible.
We can create access.
We can remove barriers.
We can redistribute resources and opportunities.
We can create safe spaces for women to organise.
We can strengthen knowledge and skills.
We can challenge discriminatory institutions.
We can make systems listen.
We can ensure that women have information, networks, resources and choices that were previously denied to them.
And then something important can begin to happen.
A woman decides.
A woman negotiates.
A woman refuses.
A woman chooses.
A woman speaks—and expects to be heard.
Perhaps that is where empowerment begins.
Freedom from. Freedom to.
On Independence Day, this distinction feels particularly important.
Freedom is not only freedom from something.
It is also freedom to.
Freedom to choose.
Freedom to speak.
Freedom to earn—and decide.
Freedom to move.
Freedom to participate—and influence.
Freedom to aspire.
Freedom to say yes.
And, equally importantly, freedom to say no.
For women, perhaps the real question is therefore not simply:
“Has she been included?”
But:
“Has her universe of choices expanded?”
And even more importantly:
“Can she act upon those choices?”
That is a much harder thing to measure.
But perhaps it is also the thing most worth measuring.
Something to keep stirring
This Independence Day, I am leaving one question in the Thought Pan:
«If a woman participates in development but does not gain greater control over the decisions that shape her life, can we really call it empowerment?»
I don’t have a neat answer.
That is precisely why it belongs here.
Some ideas need to be cooked slowly.
Tested carefully.
Questioned repeatedly.
And shared freely.
Happy Independence Day.
May our understanding of freedom continue to deepen—not only as independence, but as the everyday ability of every person to exercise choice, voice and agency.
Shift in language. Shift in mindset.
THE THOUGHT PAN CONVERSATIONS
Cooking ideas slowly. Testing them carefully. Serving them freely.
Every Saturday, we put one familiar idea back into the pan—and see what happens when we stir it again.
GyaniNani's Reading Room 