Cooking ideas slowly. Testing them carefully. Serving them freely.
Counting vs Measuring
When did counting become the same as measuring change?
We counted 500 women trained.
We counted 300 livelihoods created.
We counted 20 villages reached.
And yes, these numbers matter.
But after years of working with communities, I increasingly find myself asking a different question:
What actually changed?
A woman may have been trained. But does she now earn?
She may earn. But does she decide how that money is spent?
She may have joined an enterprise. But can she travel independently to the market, negotiate with a buyer, open and operate her own bank account, or decide what happens to her income?
And perhaps an even more uncomfortable question:
Did the programme reduce any of her burdens—or did we simply add “entrepreneur” to the many roles she was already expected to perform?
Our dashboards are very good at counting participation.
They are less comfortable measuring agency, negotiation, dignity, confidence and shifts in power.
That is where quantitative evidence needs to sit beside qualitative enquiry, observation and conversations that allow us to understand not only what changed, but why, for whom—and whether that change really mattered.
Because 500 women participating in a programme is an achievement.
But 500 women having greater control over their lives?
That is change.
A shift in numbers tells us what happened.
A shift in agency tells us whether development happened.
— Deepali Bhattacharya
THOUGHT PAN | Shift the measure. Shift the meaning.
GyaniNani's Reading Room 